A Jesuit Speaks Out Against Birth Control, 1925!

January 29th, 2012

My father was a good student.  He received two scholarships: 4 years to a Jesuit high school and 4 years to the University of Detroit.  As a result I have the Varsity News published by UD (December 1925).  This magazine has an article on my dad titled “He’s the Best Student in the University.”  In looking through the magazine I noticed an article titled “This Pig-Philosophy” written by Rev. John A McClorey, S.J., a professor of metaphysics, in which he speaks out against birth control.  Following are some quotes from the Introduction and the article.

(Introduction to the article: “Aroused by the notoriety recently given the tenets of the ‘pig philosophy’—Fr. McClorey attacked these subversive teachings in an address which he delivered before his classes in the Arts and Science College just before Thanksgiving.  He treated the subject with the frankness, sincerity, force and logic which have made his Lenten and other addresses famous throughout the West.”)

The article begins: “I apologize to you for speaking of birth control.  For though of late it has become quite the ‘respectable’ thing, it is nothing more than what Carlyle would call  ‘Pig Philosophy,’  which emphasizes with the insistence of pornographic degeneracy the unveiled passionateness of Sex.  Why should I speak equably, with chill and measured detachment, in the presence of an evil that is striking at children, the home, the nation and the race?”

Other quotes in the article:
“Birth control is an unnatural vice because by physical or chemical means it directly and intentionally frustrates the primary end of marriage.  If an exception could be made to the natural law against it, it could not be made by men and women under the law, but by God, the Author of the law.  We may control nature, not frustrate it.  But birth control is birth frustration.”

“The program of birth controllers is a direct and powerful appeal to sexual indulgence.”

“Birth control destroys mutual marital affection and respect…Birth control destroys mutual respect.  For it is what Bernard Shaw calls ‘Reciprocal Masturbation.’  Birth controllers who surfeit themselves with sexual delight, then defeat the reproductive purpose and consequence of that delight, are more unnatural and disgusting than the ancient aristocracy of Rome who used to feast to repletion, then take an emetic (pardon the reference), vomit and return to another feast.”

Fr. McClorey ends his article:
“Birth control is in contradiction to Christ charity. ‘The survival of the fittest’ is plausable. But Christ did not act on that principle.  On the contrary, He was the Friend of the down-and-out—the poor, the lame, the sick, the deaf and dumb, the lepers, the weakminded, the vicious, the possessed.  He took care of them, saw that they survived, and bettered them.  He did not wish to extinguish them by birth control or any other means.

“But birth controllers flatter the rich, assuring them that the uncontrolled fecundity of the poor, and their own cupidity, is responsible for misery and poverty.  Indeed, they go further into the vice of positive cruelty.  For since they do not want an unfit future race; since the unfortunate can procreate only an unfit future race; since the unfortunate will do so if they are sheltered and made comfortable by the charity of the rich, therefore the rich ought to withhold their charity and let the flotsam and jetsam of humanity perish out of hand.  This diabolical doctrine can be found in Mrs. Sanger’s latest book.

“Christ brought into the world a thing which had not been here before, the sweetest thing on earth: Mercy and compassion in the hearts of the well-to-do towards the victims of fate, and peace, self-respect and humility in the hearts of the unfortunate.  This may be called the beautiful soul of Christianity.  And its body has been an improved and ever improving condition among the masses of Christianity.  If we practice the charity of Christ, we shall not enjoy, it is true, the perfect prosperity of a bourgouis heaven on earth proposed by birth controllers, but we shall have a condition of decent sufficiency.”

Sheila Kippley

Not Amorous During the Infertile Time

January 22nd, 2012

My wonderful wife and I have three incredible children and we have been using the NFP method for about 7 or 8 years. Because of our age and our finances, we would prefer to be responsible, be thankful and are blessed to have the children God has given to us.

On a ‘personal’ note, because we want to be intimate during the non-fertile phase, we (well, I) find that my wife has far less interest in activity during that time, especially when her menstrual cycle is close. She becomes far more amorous during the times when she is  ovulating and we need to abstain.  We hold out on intercourse during the month and by the time we can share ourselves, the interest has waned because of natural causes.

Is this something you’ve discovered, heard about or experienced personally, and if so, what thoughts can you share. I’ve done a google search to no avail.

John:
Yes.  We have certainly heard of this, and it’s very understandable. The Lord made us this way.  In previous ages people had to work hard physically, and I imagine they got just as smelly as we do when we have a lot of physical exercise without any deodorants.  But the Lord wanted them to get together at the fertile time.  So he made woman in such a way that she feels more amorous at the fertile time, and some researchers think that her cervical mucus (or some other source) emits pheromes that are picked up by her husband’s olfactory senses that go beyond the simple sense of smelling something very obvious.  These pheromes make her more “attractive.”

I try to keep emphasizing that the marriage act is not just “having sex.” Animals “have sex.”  But only humans can come together to consciously celebrate their marriage in the marriage act.  The marriage act ought to be a renewal of the marriage covenant — the gift of self, the caring love, and the commitment of the marriage itself.

My suggested “remedy” for the situation you have discovered is for the spouses to try to recognize more deeply that the marriage act, like marriage itself, is not primarily for the self but for the other. Husbands with their typically much stronger drives toward sexual union can overlook this very easily because they can be satisfied at almost any time.  However, if a wife forgets this, she may have difficulty putting herself into it, so to speak.  On the other hand, if she can internalize that engaging in the marriage act during the infertile times when she feels less “sexy” is a great marriage act because it is a great gift of self, she may find great satisfaction, even if not exactly the same kind as she might have during the most fertile time, and sometimes even more satisfying as a renewal of their marriage covenant.  All one has to do is to reflect on some couple you know who have divorced, and that thought should make your own marriage act even more of an act of loving gratitude.

So, let an attitude of gratitude permeate your marital embraces.  Let me suggest that it may be helpful if each spouse, during those moments of silence is praying, “Thank you, Jesus, for my spouse.”

Another suggestion is to not watch any TV “shows” because it seems that they are so oriented toward stimulating lust within us.  I don’t say that on the basis of watching them but from the ads I see when I watch a sports event or from reviews I read.

I hope this hasn’t been too preachy but at least a little bit helpful.

In his service,
John F Kippley
NFP International
www.NFPandmore.org
Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality (Ignatius)

Eco-Breastfeeding is the Only Way to Mother

January 15th, 2012

A woman wrote us about her search for a Catholic viewpoint on mothering. See below.

I downloaded the manual because I wanted to see what the chapter on ecological breastfeeding said. I have been doing attachment parenting and been interested in LLL [La Leche League], and I wanted to see a Catholic viewpoint on this natural mothering.  I was already doing this, but I certainly loved the chapter.

My husband is a Catholic and I discovered NFP [natural family planning]  while we were getting engaged in 2006.  It changed the way I viewed everything from my body, feminism, Catholicism, etc…  Honestly, I am not sure what I believe religiously, but all I am sure about is NFP (or ecological breastfeeding, or basically natural mothering). I am very convicted that that is the way we should mother, and I was especially drawn to the idea of a moral obligation to breastfeed.   I do not feel ready at this moment to take the steps to become an instructor.  Additionally, I want my husband to be with me on this, and while he is interested, he hasn’t read anything yet.  But I am very passionate about the ecological breastfeeding chapter in particular, and I truly believe that we will be called to be involved in teacher training in the future.

I did want to say thank you both for all the hard work and devotion you have given to defending Humanae Vitae and in coming up with the term ecological breastfeeding. I talk to mothers all the time who try to tell me I am lucky that I didn’t get my period back until 15 months or who try to tell me how unreliable breastfeeding is as a child spacer.  But I realize that it involved mothering in a totally different way than people advocate here.

In my opinion, it is so natural and wonderful.  I love mothering in this way and would not want to mother any other way. I would love to be a part of spreading good mothering and truth.  Especially since so many people are spreading the opposite of truth. Even at the last Catholic church we attended before we moved, the mothers put together a child class on Babywise, which you are probably familiar with, and I was frustrated.  Why didn’t the Catholic church there want to put together NFP classes instead?  They certainly could use a mothering support group for NFP too!

Well, we are in a new city, and not much of anything is going on with the mothers here.  I am becoming a LLL leader and will be leading those meetings soon. In addition I have started a mom’s group and I was just having the discussion last week with a mom telling her about Sheila’s book on the 7 standards since I just checked it out and was reading it from the  LLL library.  I am happy to say that I am advocating good ideas and support here to the best of my ability while still being a mom first, and I will be happy to get NFP going in the local Catholic churches here if possible.

Thanks for your time!  I hope to be contacting you in the future for my husband and my’s interest in becoming a trained leader.  Until then I say thanks for all your work and I am still working towards spreading the good ideas and supporting mothers in my own way.
________

If anyone is interested in promoting ecological breastfeeding in their community or in their Church, contact Catholic Nursing Mothers League.

If anyone is interested in teaching both systematic NFP and ecological breastfeeding in their community, contact us.  It is recommended that you have a priest who will require his engaged couples to attend your NFP classes for marriage preparation.  Otherwise, you may not have anyone to teach.

Sheila Kippley
Breastfeeding and Catholic Motherhood