<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HHS Dictates Free Birth Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nfpandmore.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nfpandmore.org/wordpress/?p=1651</link>
	<description>John and Sheila Kippley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 23:02:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Knopf</title>
		<link>http://nfpandmore.org/wordpress/?p=1651&#038;cpage=1#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Knopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nfpandmore.org/wordpress/?p=1651#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>From the USCCB Cardinal DiNardo comments on the HHS mandate.

“For example, a Catholic institution serving the poor and needy would have to fire its non-Catholic staff, refuse life-affirming care to non-Catholic people in need, and devote itself instead to ‘the inculcation of religious values’ to qualify for the exemption,” Cardinal DiNardo wrote. “Individuals, insurers, and the sponsors of non-employee health plans (e.g., student health plans in Catholic schools) would have no exemption at all. This effort to corral religion exclusively into the sanctuaries of houses of worship betrays a complete ignorance of the role of religion in American life, and of Congress’s long tradition of far more helpful laws on religious freedom.”

“Those who sponsor, purchase and issue health plans should not be forced to violate their deeply held moral and religious convictions in order to take part in the health care system or provide for the needs of their families, their employees or those most in need,” Cardinal DiNardo wrote. “To force such an unacceptable choice would be as much a threat to universal access to health care as it is to freedom of conscience.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the USCCB Cardinal DiNardo comments on the HHS mandate.</p>
<p>“For example, a Catholic institution serving the poor and needy would have to fire its non-Catholic staff, refuse life-affirming care to non-Catholic people in need, and devote itself instead to ‘the inculcation of religious values’ to qualify for the exemption,” Cardinal DiNardo wrote. “Individuals, insurers, and the sponsors of non-employee health plans (e.g., student health plans in Catholic schools) would have no exemption at all. This effort to corral religion exclusively into the sanctuaries of houses of worship betrays a complete ignorance of the role of religion in American life, and of Congress’s long tradition of far more helpful laws on religious freedom.”</p>
<p>“Those who sponsor, purchase and issue health plans should not be forced to violate their deeply held moral and religious convictions in order to take part in the health care system or provide for the needs of their families, their employees or those most in need,” Cardinal DiNardo wrote. “To force such an unacceptable choice would be as much a threat to universal access to health care as it is to freedom of conscience.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
