Archive for the ‘Priests & Parishes’ Category

Natural Family Planning: The German Irony, part 2

Monday, July 22nd, 2019

As the Sixties unfolded with more and more attention being given to the birth control Pill, Dr. G. K. Doering saw the need to test the effectiveness of the Calendar-Temperature system.  In his first system, he predicted that post ovulation infertility started by the evening of the SECOND day of sustained thermal shift.  I do not know what effectiveness he found, but he was surprised at the number of surprise pregnancies.  He changed his post-ovulation infertility rule by adding one more day.  The post-ovulation infertile phase was thus predicted to start on the evening of the THIRD day of sustained thermal shift.

In third-day study, he analyzed two groups.  One group abstained from the marriage act from the beginning of menstruation until the evening of the third day of elevated temperatures. In this group, he found a pregnancy-avoidance effectiveness of 99.2%.

The other group considered the early part of the cycle as infertile, using a calculation based on the thermal shift pattern in previous cycles.  In this group, he found a pregnancy avoidance effectiveness of 96.9 percent.  In both groups he included pregnancies that are now called imperfect-use pregnancies.  This included marriage acts during the fertile time and even at least one pregnancy from a couple using his previous second-day rule.  You can read the entire study at http://nfpandmore.org/Doering-1967-100315.pdf. This is the only English language translation of which we are aware; we hired a Professor of German to do it for us.

The IRONY.  This study was published in a German medical journal on June 9, 1967.  That’s 13 months and two weeks before the publication of Humanae Vitae.  At this time, Pope Paul VI was struggling with the birth control issue.  Seeing this research would have given him great encouragement about the current level of effectiveness of this natural system of avoiding pregnancy.  But did he ever see it?  I have to wonder.  With hindsight we know that the German bishops at that time as a whole did not accept the Traditional Catholic teaching against the use of unnatural forms of birth control.  That seems to be the case also today.  Germany is home of one of the original researchers regarding natural family planning, home of the Catholic priest who invented the Calendar-Temperature form of NFP, home of Dr. G. K. Doering who developed a highly effective Temperature-only system, and also home to the bishops who were highly non-supportive of Humanae Vitae.

As Jesus experienced his agony in the garden of Gethsemane, Peter, James and John kept falling asleep.  As the Church today is experiencing its agony of sexual sins, too many bishops seem to be proving themselves to be the descendants of the Apostles, asleep at the hour of need.  Dear reader, please pray for our bishops that they will wake up and realize what great helps the Lord has given his people to live out the teaching of Humanae Vitae.

Tomorrow:  The Covenant Theology

John F. Kippley
Sex and the Marriage Covenant

 

Natural Family Planning: The German Irony

Sunday, July 21st, 2019

After it was scientifically established that the human female has a fertility cycle, it became a matter of practical research to further establish the limits of the fertile time—when it starts and when it ends. Researchers on both sides of the world pursued this, and we know two of them—Kyusaku Ogino in Japan and Hermann Knaus in Germany. In February 1930, Ogino published his system of fertility awareness in a German medical journal, and Knaus soon conceded that the Ogino system was better than his. This was the beginning of Calendar Rhythm.

In August of that year, the Anglican Bishops at their periodic Lambeth conference were either ignorant of this new reality of spacing babies or ignored it. Seeing only a dichotomy of permanent abstinence or more and more children, they gave their permission for married couples to use unnatural forms of birth control. This poured gas on the flames of the contraceptive sexual revolution that had been started in the USA in 1914 by Margaret Sanger.

In 1935 a German Catholic priest, Fr. Wilhelm Hillebrand, learned from his brother—a doctor—that other research had shown that a woman’s basal body temperature rose after ovulation. He linked this to the Ogino-Knaus calculations for post-ovulation infertility, thus becoming the originator of the Calendar-Temperature method.

It is horribly ironic that after condemning marital contraception in both 1908 and 1920, the majority of the Anglican bishops abandoned the Christian Tradition just six months after the discovery of a system of naturally avoiding or postponing pregnancy.

Tomorrow:  the second German irony.

John F. Kippley
Sex and the Marriage Covenant

Natural Family Planning and the DDP Standards

Sunday, May 5th, 2019

The USCCB Diocesan Development Plan has certain standards for teaching natural family planning. Below is John’s writing on the need to have the DDP Standards modified to include Ecological Breastfeeding and the merits of breastfeeding. Below are his written concerns to the director of the DDP.

1.  The Standards need to recognize that there are two distinct form of birth spacing—Ecological Breastfeeding and Systematic NFP.  The current definition of NFP does not include Ecological Breastfeeding, and thus it does not correspond to the full reality.

2.  In addition, the current Standard dealing with breastfeeding deals with it more as a charting problem than something to be encouraged and as the healthiest form of baby care.  Not only teachers but every client should know the tremendous health benefits of breastfeeding AND that the frequency of Ecological Breastfeeding actually DOES act as an abstinence-free  natural baby spacer.

I am convinced that the Church has a responsibility to share in the public health effort to increase breastfeeding of any sort and secondly to extend its duration.  The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recently came out with another effort to promoted breastfeeding.  Also, a recent Dutch journal dealing with lung health opposed formula-feeding strongly for families with a history of asthma.  It speculated whether formula should be by prescription-only for such families.

And, if the Church has a responsibility to inform its members about the health benefits of breastfeeding, where can that be done better than in pre-marriage preparation and especially within a required NFP course?

John F. Kippley