Archive for the ‘Breastfeeding Benefits’ Category

Why Breastfeed for Two Years?

Sunday, January 6th, 2019

The WHO and UNICEF recently (November 2018) listed the benefits for breastfeeding during the second year of life.  The benefits are listed below.

“Children who are not breastfed at 12-23 months of age are about twice as likely to die as those who are breastfed in the second year of life.”

Average breast milk intake at 12-23 months contributes “approximately 35-40% of the young child’s energy needs.”

Continued breastfeeding “during infections reduces the duration of illness and improves nutritional status.”

“The protection of breastfeeding against childhood overweight is strongest for those breastfed for more than one year.  In the U.S. among low-income children, those breastfed for at least 12 months were 28% less likely to be overweight at four years of age than those never breastfed.”

“Breastfeeding for more than 12 months reduces breast cancer by 26%.”

“Continued breastfeeding delays the return to fertility, contributing to longer birth intervals in the absence of contraceptive use.”

“Breastfeeding for more than 12 months reduces breast cancer by 26%.”

“The reduction in ovarian cancer for breastfeeding longer than 12 months was 37%.”

“Each additional year of lifetime duration of breastfeeding was associated with a 9% protection against type 2 diabetes.”

Why breastfeed for two years?  “Because continued breastfeeding for two years and beyond saves lives and promotes the health of both the mother and baby.”

                                              ***
All of these benefits are reasons to practice Ecological Breastfeeding.  In the American culture, mothers who do not do Ecological Breastfeeding (or something close to it) will rarely have a milk supply after 12 months.

Sheila Kippley

WHO: Mothers, Please Breastfeed for Two Years

Sunday, December 30th, 2018

The new guidelines by the World Health Organization and UNICEF stress that breastfeeding “for at least two years improves child survival and the health of mothers and babies.”  Because breastfeeding is so important, milk substitutes  targeted for children under three are to be stopped.    Research shows that babies breastfed the second year of life live longer.  “Children who are not breastfed at 12-23 months of age are about twice as likely to die as those who are breastfed in the second year of life.”

These new guidelines stress some important benefits for mother and baby, and the guidelines can be read in three pages.  One of the advantages for continued breastfeeding is natural spacing of births.  “Continued breastfeeding delays the return to fertility, contributing to longer birth intervals in the absence of contraceptive use.”  If this is a known fact among researchers and certain secular authorities, why doesn’t the rest of the natural family planning movement promote this form of natural birth spacing?

Interestingly, children are breastfed for at least two years in 41 out of 130 countries.

Milk substitutes often replace or reduce or stop breastfeeding in young children.  Thus breast milk substitutes should not be marketed for children up to 36 months old.

The four main benefits in this 3-page paper are these: 1) reduced mortality for the child, 2) improved nutrition, 3) protection against childhood overweight and 4) improved maternal health.  The research is provided.   Specific health benefits for the breastfeeding occurring during the second year of life will be given next week.

Sheila Kippley

 

 

Natural Family Planning and Breastfeeding

Sunday, July 1st, 2018

It is unfortunate that when natural family planning is discussed that almost  no one speaks on behalf of the positive alternative of Ecological Breastfeeding.  Maybe some will mention other forms of natural birth spacing, but it is rare if there is a mention of Ecological Breastfeeding.  There is ample research to demonstrate that the pattern of frequent breastfeeding that we term Ecological Breastfeeding postpones the return of fertility.  In some pre-bottlefeeding cultures, breastfeeding produces birth intervals of three to four years with no forms of contraception.  Our research in American culture shows an average return of menstruation between 14 and 15 months for those mothers following the Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding.  Those Seven Standards are maternal behaviors associated with an extended time of breastfeeding amenorrhea.

My wife has written extensively on this,  but she (and research of others as well) is ignored by the current NFP establishment as well as the anti-abortion establishment.

It has become typical for television coverage of hurricanes in the Caribbean islands to show a young mother complaining that no one is giving her any food for her very young baby when she has God’s own food in her breasts.  It makes me sick to see this.  Why hasn’t the Church done more to educate these folks about breastfeeding for its tremendous health benefits and also for its natural spacing benefit?

We have lots of information on this at our website: www.nfpandmore.org.  Enjoy!

John Kippley
NFPI President and Volunteer