Archive for 2011

Kudos to Ann and K.L. Berry for Teaching NFP!

Sunday, November 13th, 2011

Last month John and I received a retirement letter from Ann and K.L. Berry.  They had taken a sabbatical and after much contemplation decided with heavy hearts to retire from teaching NFP.  They started Lamaze couple-to-couple teaching in the spring of 1971 that culminated in the 1980s with childbirth preparation and labor coaching for unwed mothers. In 1986 they became CCL teachers and then became NFPI teachers in the fall of 2007.  Over the 40 years they have taught almost 4000 couples.  While many NFP teachers only offer 2 to 3 NFP courses a year, Ann and K.L. Berry taught 8 NFP courses each year and loved it!

The Berrys realize how important teaching NFP is for the Church.  As they said: “While natural family planning is largely given only lip service from the Catholic pulpit, it is perhaps the most essential, most fundamental aspect of right-to-life and the marriage covenant.”

We thank them for their service to the Church in the Denver archdiocese.  K.L. was especially helpful to us in the formation of NFPI with regard to the design of the logo, graphics, letterhead, etc.  We are so grateful for their support of NFPI.  The Berrys believed “that the course CCL had taught for over 30 years remains essentially valid and vital.”  When CCL changed, the Berrys continued to teach the original Triple Strand by joining NFPI.

In their 2007 analysis of the evaluations from 500 engaged couples who were required to be at a full NFP course, Ann and K.L. concluded the following for the archdiocese of Denver:
•  Virtually all couples understand and can use the Sympto-Thermal Method.
•  Many engaged women have begun Sympto-Thermal charting.
•  Some of the many cohabitating engaged couples cease pre-marital sexual relations, apparently embracing the courses’s Sex and the Marriage Covenant theology.
•  Most couples express very positive regard for the class on natural mothering and ecological breastfeeding—the world’s oldest form of natural child spacing.

Ann and K.L., You will be missed!  God bless you and yours.  John and Sheila

Battle-Scarred: Justice Can Be Elusive
by John F. Kippley
Why did Macleans magazine write a page-one article titled “Why do they want to drive John Kippley out of Saskatchewan?”  Learn the history of the NFP movement and the dissent history of Humanae Vitae from the years 1963-2010.  What mistakes did John make?  What advice does he give?  Why did my husband and I begin a new NFP organization in the fall of 2004? Get a copy and enjoy.

Sheila Kippley

The Recent AAP Statement on SIDS and Bedsharing

Sunday, November 6th, 2011

I have been saddened by the new American Academy of Pediatrics’ Statement on SIDS (Pediatrics, November 2011).  The AAP include two recommendations which can cancel out the benefit of extended breastfeeding amenorrhea: sleep in the same room but not the same bed (in other words, no bedsharing between mother and infant) and use a pacifier.

In our community new parents may be told in the hospital to “never sleep with your baby.”  Have these folks ever nursed a baby sitting up during the cold, dark night and fallen asleep while doing so?  Have they ever almost dropped their baby while nursing in a comfortable chair during the middle hours of the night?  Some parents fear the crib or their bed due to poor instruction and fall asleep nursing their baby on a couch or elsewhere where their babies can be at much greater risk.

In Cincinnati the Police and Citizens on Patrol are now handing out pamphlets warning parents about the alleged dangers of sleeping with their baby.  Here is my husband’s response followed by Dr. James McKenna’s response.

JOHN: “I am a former member of Citizens on Patrol and would strenuously object to distributing the semi-false-alarm material dealing with co-sleeping.  Fortunately we raised our children before the current effort to spread these semi-false alarms.  Our last four children slept in our family bed.  (With our first, we shared the fears now being promulgated.) Let’s start by remembering that SIDS formerly was called crib death.  The family bed is the safest place for a baby when the parents practice the same safe-sleep practices they will have to adopt for crib sleeping — no toys, a firm mattress, no soft pillows or pets or siblings near baby, etc.  In addition, the mother should be breastfeeding and the parents have to be non-smokers, not obese, and not under the influence of alcohol or other drugs.  It also helps greatly to have a king-size mattress.  It’s also the easiest way to do ecological breastfeeding, the kind that normally postpones the return of fertility for well over a year.  A better informed health department, police force, and COP groups should be promoting breastfeeding and safe-sleep practices including the presence only of the baby’s married parents in the family bed.”

Dr. James McKenna has been informed about the anti-bedsharing campaign in Cincinnati, and has responded eloquently.   What follows are his unique qualifications and then his comments.
QUALIFICATIONS:  Dr. James J. McKenna, has published no less than 50 or so peer reviewed papers on cosleeping—cosleeping in the form of bedsharing,  breastfeeding and SIDS reduction—all in the top medical journals in the world. He was recently selected as a “Fellow” in the world’s most prestigious scientific organization, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (an honor accorded to only about 10% of America’s top scientists ). Dr. McKenna supports and defends a family’s choice to bedshare when adverse factors can be eliminated and if the mother is breastfeeding. He has argued consistently in his publications for the best possible education being provided for bedsharing families rather than simply depriving them of information that itself can be life-saving. He insists that so powerful is the biological connection between sleeping close and in contact while breastfeeding that at some point, even those mothers who didn’t intend to bedshare with their babies find themselves doing so because mothers and infants acquire more sleep, babies are happier and more settled, and moms manage their milk supply more efficiently.

DR. JAMES McKENNA:
“I hope the lactation committee and parents everywhere will rise up to correct the deficiencies of this overly simplistic statement and remind the authorities that it is not their right or capacity on any level to decide where an infant will sleep but the parents’ decision. Indeed, access to each others bodies in the context of the infant eliciting its needs and the mother responding (infant to the mother’s, mother to the infant’s) is an inherent civil, human right [emphasis mine].

Sleeping with a baby is biologically appropriate and will not be subject to cultural, political or medical nullification. Breastfeeding mothers sleeping next to an infant on the same surface or close by is how the system was designed by nature to work, optimally maximizing the chances of infant survival.

Safe infant sleep begins prenatally by the mother never ingesting smoke during her pregnancy as smoke is absorbed by her fetus/infant to damage critical specific brain cells required for lifesaving infant protective responses to breathing pauses and apneas, therein maintaining sufficient oxygen saturation levels.

Safe sleep begins with exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months.  This protects infants from SIDS and other kinds of deaths, likely because infants sleep more lightly and arouse more frequently, while increased protection is simultaneously afforded by receiving mother’s home grown antibodies targeted against microbes or germs found in the very environment in which the infant will live.

Safe infant sleep means never letting an infant sleep in a room by itself without the presence of the committed caregiver reminding us that it is not the inert walls of the room during “roomsharing” that protects the infant but rather who is in the room and what they do while sleeping close.

Separate surface cosleeping (mother and baby within sensory range on different surfaces) saves infants lives, according to four epidemiological studies.  Safe infant sleep means placing infants on their backs for sleep giving them easy access to mother’s breast, the original function of babies sleeping on their backs.

Safe infant sleep involves exclusive breastfeeding and saves more infant lives from SIDS and other causes of death than safe forms of bedsharing kills them.  That is, safe bedsharing is about the absence of adverse independent SIDS risk factors such as bottlefeeding, placing infants prone, having smoked during pregnancy, other children in the bed and bedsharers taking illegal drugs, sedatives, or alcohol.”
___________

Those couples interested in lactational amenorrhea should read The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor.  It lists over 20 benefits to bedsharing besides the benefit of extended breastfeeding amenorrhea.

Additional reading recommended is The Womanly Art of Breastfeeding. This La Leche League manual has good information on bedsharing.

I would also encourage you to go to “links” at www.NFPandmore.org.  Scroll down and review the information and brochures on safe bedsharing guidelines, especially when breastfeeding.

For excellent information on bedsharing, go to Dr. McKenna’s website.  He “has powerpoints, articles (downloadable) and videos with interviews about cosleeping and explains how to bedshare as safely as is possible.”  Also read an excellent blog on the scar tactics of Milwaukee’s Safe Sleep Campaign.  Another interesting article shows a country’s Infant Mortality Rate could be related to the number of vaccines required by that country.

Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor

The Poor Deserve Breastfeeding, Not Formula

Sunday, October 30th, 2011

A quotation from Dr. Ruth Lawrence about breastfeeding and the poor says it well:
Breastfeeding is the most precious gift a mother can give her infant.
If there is illness or infection, it may be a life-saving gift.
If there is poverty, it may be the only gift.

As breastfeeding expert Dee Keith puts it, “Give a family a tin of formula and you feed an infant for a day.  Give a mom tools and education and she can feed her child for 12 months or longer from her own body and protect his health for a lifetime.”

During the Haiti disaster it was sad to see on TV an amply-endowed mother of a newborn complaining that she had no formula for her baby.  Why wasn’t her culture teaching her to breastfeed?

We know of a young man, now studying to become a priest, who spent several years in Honduras.  He soon realized that no mothers in his area breastfed their babies anymore!  They had been convinced that formula is superior!

The good news about the young man’s experience is that he had just finished his master’s thesis on motherhood.  It includes a section in which he maintains that, through nursing, infants develop the appropriate relationship with their mothers–and with God!

Please promote breastfeeding among the poor—whether at home or abroad. If you know any missionaries personally, try to get them to evangelize through breastfeeding.  It certainly is part of God’s plan for mothers and babies.  Avoid giving money to those organizations that work among the poor but do not support breastfeeding and readily distribute free formula. Even if it’s “free,” it’s not really free because it costs them the loss of breastfeeding’s normal health benefits.

Sheila Kippley