Archive for 2014

NFP: Effects of Breastfeeding and Non-Breastfeeding in a Community

Sunday, October 5th, 2014

In going over my old files, I found one mother’s view as written to me in 1971.

“I happened to grow up in a small, rural Catholic community. I saw the first baby totally bottlefed when I was 14 years old. The custom was to nurse a baby for at least 16-18 months. When the parish held its centennial in the early 1950s, they set a lot of records: no divorces in 100 years, only one crime, vocations per family as high as any in the nation (one family had 3 priests and 4 nuns), strong tie between parents and children.

Today in the same town a totally bottlefed generation is making the scene. The change has produced drastic results. There is no longer the strong bond between parents and children. Over half of the young mothers work outside of the home. They appear to lack the strong maternal feelings of their own mothers who would never leave their babies with sitters. Today one doesn’t see many babies or smaller children at public functions like weddings, church functions, neighborhood gatherings like in the past. More and more they are confined to the home and the parents go out alone. Many parents throw their hands up in the air when talking of their teenage children. Drinking and reckless driving has gotten out of hand completely among their teens, they say. There hasn’t been a religious vocation in the last couple of years. On the surface this parish seems to be having more trouble than most with the children. I know there has been many changes in living to account for some of these troubles but I STILL wonder if the switch to bottlefeeding didn’t lay the ground work especially in the area of family unity? I forgot to mention that at one time breastfeeding was the only method of birth control. When bottlefeeding became popular more couples were reluctant to use rhythm; for a while some couples had a new baby every 11 months or babies very close — like 8 in 7 years. Once rhythm became popular and the ONLY alternative for these Catholics, the younger couples began to rebel (20 to 30 years of nothing but rhythm seemed ridiculous) so today they are switching to contraceptives.

I realize that in this day that breastfeeding alone isn’t the whole answer in controlling births, especially if a small family is desired. However, in talking with young Catholic students, I found them more receptive to the Church’s teaching on birth control when breastfeeding with its natural spacing factor was added to the list of Church approved methods. Most of them had no idea that breastfeeding had anything to do with infertility.

I realize that my views on breastfeeding are very subjective but I am prompted by the Holy Spirit to speak out and to work in this area. One might say I am angry for God’s glory.”

(PS: This mother had a brother-in-law who worked in Peru among the Indians. She said that the Indians there nursed for 3-4 years and the mothers didn’t offer any liquid from the cup. The children just imitate when ready. Also he said the missionaries and French nuns discouraged breastfeeding past one year because they felt the children should be more aggressive like American children. This mother has then wondered since then how much bottlefeeding and violence go together and has written letters requesting a study be done on sex offenders, drug addicts, hippies, etc. to find out how many were nursed for a year or longer. She uses a year as a starting point to eliminate all restricted forms of nursing.)

4. Church Teaching Regarding Natural Family Planning Has Been Ignored. Why?

Sunday, September 28th, 2014

[Continuation of last week’s blog]

Our concern then is how can the contraceptive mentality be overcome? The answer is not easy, to say the least. We feel that the Magisterium has addressed this issue and has emerged with a solid stance via Humanae Vitae.

In summary:

  1. The Problem: many Catholics do not realize or believe that they have a need for a natural method of family planning.
  2. The Symptoms: evidenced by the incorrect attitude espoused by the child-bearing Catholics who feel that they have a “right” to practice child-spacing by whatever means they feel is best.
  3. The Reasons: First, the misuse of the “freedom of conscience” philosophy by many of the clergy and laity; Second, the incorrect assumption by some that the Church’s teachings on contraception will be changed sooner or later.
  4. Contributing Factors: Non-recognition of the problem by the grass roots level of the Church, unintentionally fostering the contraceptive mentality in two ways: First, by contributing to the belief by Catholics that through benign acceptance the grass roots level of the Church condones contraception; Second, by ignoring the issue, creating a void quickly filled with incorrect theology whose acceptance has spread and intensified into overwhelming proportions of today. The result is that Catholics have been unintentionally miseducated at almost every juncture on means of family planning.

It is our hope that at the conclusion of the Decade of the Family in 1990, we all may feel proud and satisfied with the gains made in improving this situation.

Thank you for the opportunity to present this concern to you.
Respectfully submitted.
John and Cathy Bloodworth, Chaircouple
Natural Family Planning Association of KY (1979)

(By John and Cathy Bloodworth in consultation with Rev. Joseph F. Hayden of the Archdiocese of Louisville)

PS:  An update:  Is there something “artificial” about natural family planning?  See John’s response to Cardinal Walter Kasper at Homiletic & Pastoral Review.

3. Church Teaching Regarding Natural Family Planning Has Been Ignored. Why?

Sunday, September 21st, 2014

[Continuation of last week’s blog]

In addition to the two primary reasons, there are several contributing factors which have served to stimulate and intensify the contraceptive mentality.

First, the non-recognition of the presence of this incorrect attitude in the face of the overwhelming evidence of its existence is incorrectly viewed by Catholics. They see it as an indication of benign acceptance of artificial contraception by the Church at the grass roots level.  This non-recognition leads to further problems.

By not responding to the issue, the Church at the grass roots level is allowing an incorrect theology to continue uncorrected. Thus, what was once historically practiced by a few has, over a period of a generation or so, spread and become so accepted that now the great majority believe they have the right to practice what they choose.

The contraceptive mentality has grown by a snow-balling effect. The longer we ignore its presence, the more entrenched it becomes. The more entrenched it becomes, the more cancerous is the effect on the other aspects of marital life.

What then, we may ask, would be the proper response to addressing and overcoming this contraceptive mentality? We feel that the most effective way would be for the grass roots level to convey the teachings of the Magisterium whenever, wherever, and however the issue presents itself. Anything less not only is incorrect, but a disservice to families, the Church, and all of society.

One juncture at which the Church’s teachings could be positively conveyed would be at our Pre-Cana Conference. The most natural time to help young couples would be as they prepare for marriage. It would be an excellent time to share the fullness of the Church’s teachings and to help them form a right conscience regarding family planning.

Another juncture would be in our schools. Do the present school textbooks which touch upon this subject offer the traditional teachings of the Magisterium and present them in a favorable light? Clearly, Catholics, especially the young ones, need to be re-educated on this important issue in accordance with the teaching and attitude of the Magisterium.

As members of the Natural Family Planning Association of Kentucky, we could go on forever about the multitude of benefits of natural methods of family planning and the wisdom of it. After five years of involvement in NFP, we can attest that the natural method has a far more positive effect on marriage than artificial means. Natural family planning has been proven effective and safe. Never before in the history of the Church has it had such a positive alternative to offer its people.

(By John and Cathy Bloodworth in consultation with Rev. Joseph F. Hayden of the Archdiocese of Louisville)

PS:  An update:  Is there something “artificial” about natural family planning?  See John’s response to Cardinal Walter Kasper at Homiletic & Pastoral Review.