Archive for 2016

Natural Family Planning: The Effectiveness of the Temperature Sign

Sunday, November 20th, 2016

(50% discount on Kippley books starting tomorrow!)
______________________________________________
An unlikely source for recognizing the temperature sign was Dr. Christopher Tietze of the Population Council.  I say “unlikely” because he was an advocate of contraception and abortion, but he was honest about the value of temperature charting as a sign of infertility.

In his 1970 article “Ranking of Contraceptive Methods by Levels of Effectiveness,” he wrote that the most effective methods were surgical sterilization, oral contraceptives, injectable progestational agents, and the temperature method.  He stated the method failures from all these methods.

What did Dr. Tietze say about the temperature sign?  In his words:  “The determination of ovulation by means of basal body temperature and restriction of coitus to the post-ovulation phase of the cycle, also falls into the most highly effective group of contraceptive methods.”  He quoted from two studies.  1) A single method failure in 17,500 cycles among a group of highly motivated and disciplined couples. 2) Five method failures in about 5,000 cycles.

If our readers want more information on the temperature sign, we have this information at our website and in our teaching manual, Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach.

Sheila and John Kippley

Natural Family Planning: A very effective rule ignored!

Sunday, November 13th, 2016

Recently the writer of a chart review article in CCL’s Family Foundations wrote as follows concerning the start of Phase 3, post-ovulation infertility.  “Don’t ever consider the start of Phase III before P+3.  Using the ST [Sympto-Thermal] Rule, there will never be a start of Phase III before P+3, so don’t even bother looking there.”  (Andy Alderson,  FF, Sept-Oct 2016, p 36).  If Mr. Alderson had said that this applied only to the current CCL version of Dr. Josef Roetzer’s version of the ST system, he would have been correct.  However, that is not the only contemporary ST system, and another system finds that the start of Phase 3 can start on the evening of P+2.

For years, the CCL taught that Phase 3 starts on the evening of Peak Day plus 2 days of drying up crosschecked by at least 3 days of full thermal shift—three temps consecutively at least 4/10ths of one degree F above the lower level of temps.  That rule is based on the excellent results reported by Dr. G. K. Doering who reported a 99% level of effectiveness with a three-day temperature-only rule.  Note that Dr. Doering’s study was based only on the temperature sign without any crosscheck from the mucus sign.  When Dr. Konald Prem, longtime chief medical advisor to CCL, was asked whether CCL should teach that rule, he wanted to teach it only in a Sympto-Thermal version, so he insisted that the three days of full thermal shift had to be crosschecked by at least two days of drying up past Peak Day.  This was to guard against a “false” temperature rise caused by a cold or fever or something else not related to post-ovulation progesterone.   Our combined thinking was that if the couples in Dr. Doering’s study could achieve an effectiveness rate of 99.2% without any crosscheck from the mucus sign, our couples should be able to do just as well or even better with a crosscheck from the mucus sign.

It is also of interest that the pregnancies that counted against the Doering system’s effectiveness were all “imperfect use” pregnancies; that is, the couples did not follow the rules of the system being tested.  In fact, Dr. Doering wrote: “On the 3rd day of the hyper-thermal phase a conception has never been observed [and recorded in the literature], so that later the strict form of the temperature method was formulated in such a way that not until the 3rd day of the hyper-thermal phase could infertility be counted on.”  In our website text, we added [and recorded in the literature] because we are skeptical of 100% claims regarding natural phenomena.

To the best of our knowledge, NFP International is the only American-based organization to teach this highly effective approach.  The CCL organizations in the Czech Republic and Slovakia also continue to teach this approach.

When we first saw this change in 2007, we objected, but we were told that a couple can always wait one more day.  That’s true in one sense, but not in another.  That is, on the next day, one of the spouses may be out of town for a day or a week or even for months in the case of a military deployment.

The philosophy that we and Dr. Prem brought to the CCL was to give couples sufficient information so that they could make a well informed decision.  We pray that CCL will return to that philosophy of education.

Thanks for reading.  Please come back again next week.

John and Sheila, November 12, 2016

 

Chaste Natural Family Planning

Sunday, November 6th, 2016

Why do we mention masturbation and marital sodomy in our course?

It’s because we listen and read.  People have told us that at one time they were practicing their own form of “NFP” with masturbation during the fertile time.  One woman told us that she and her husband had taken an NFP course from a different organization and heard none of this.  They practiced fertile-time masturbation for eight years.  Then she read that the Catholic Church teaches that this is immoral.  They changed, and so have others who have learned that their behavior was wrong.  We know couples who not only changed but also became NFP teachers so they could help other couples know and live the truth about married love.  See Chapter 7, “Witness” in our teaching manual Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach.

We have read in the daily papers that in some parts of the United States about half of high school teenagers have experienced oral sex, that is, oral sodomy.  It takes no genius to figure out that if they somehow attend an NFP course and hear “abstinence” during the fertile time, they may start thinking in terms of their previous behavior unless they learn that it’s immoral.

Chaste abstinence is the pregnancy-avoiding “method” of true systematic NFP.

John and Sheila Kippley